sexylicious friday ..

does sexy equals minimalist? look at jodie foster (though she tarnished her reputation for a small role, in my opinion), siti nurhaliza, err... the late Lady Diana(?), gosh i couldn't think of anyone else, ah! Jemima Khan, one beautiful lady there. they're normally covered but they still ooze sexiness. well, this thought just occurs to me after talking about the upcoming d&d. i said that i'd be wearing whatever i have in my closet, which is not many considering my current expanding waist. then someone came out saying as long as its sexy, it should match the theme. hmm, what is sexy? does glamourous means sexy? does glamourous have to be sexy? but then again, look at those people mentioned here. always dress immaculately yet still ooze some sexiness from within.
this reminds me of a chat we had few weeks ago, when a friend brought a topic of uniform party (not those sleazy, kinky kinda party though). we then talked about our school uniforms and we asked the malaysians if everyone have to use the 'baju kurung'-style uniform. then a guy said that actually he likes seeing girls in that outfit with reason being that ladies look elegant in that kind of outfit and made them wonder more. i shared about the talk i had with the boys back in my working day in batam, basically on dress-code as well. the chat evolved into a discussion about the 'leave some for imagination' belief and its true, a lot of people are intrigue on not knowing how sexy siti nurhaliza is - nobody has the chance to know, well apart from her hubby now.
so what is sexy? does skimpy means sexy? do you feel sexy when you dressed for someone or when you dressed for yourself? well, for me - just like beauty, sexy is in the eyes of the beholder

lunch time .. gosh it's already december!!